Miro vs Figma: Which is better in 2026?

In the race to choose the “best” tool, businesses often overlook what actually works best for their needs. That’s why when it comes to collaboration platforms used by modern teams, Miro and Figma consistently rank among the top choices. I’ve used both platforms across brainstorming sessions, product planning, UI wireframing, and prototyping workflows. While Miro is designed for visual teamwork and ideation, Figma is built for UI/UX design and interactive prototyping.

The real purpose of both tools remains different, maybe not entirely, but they work on different stages. Miro focuses on the thinking stage, including brainstorming, sticky notes, mind maps, team workshops, and planning frameworks. Figma, on the other hand, dominates the building stage involving UI design, wireframing, component systems, and interactive prototypes that resemble real apps and websites.

So if you’re wondering whether Miro can replace Figma, the answers depends on your workflow, team structure and project goals. In this Miro vs Figma comparison, I’ll help you explore the differences in features, pricing, collaboration, pros/cons, and use cases to help you decide which platform is better for your needs.

Miro vs Framer Overview

Miro Platform Background

Originally launched as RealtimeBoard, Miro was found in 2011 by Andrey Khusid and Oleg Shardin, and later rebraded in 2019. Since then it has grown into the most widely used collaboration tools globally. Today, it supports 100+ million users and is trusted by 250,000+ organisations, including globals names such as Nike, IKEA, Delotte, Cisco and WPP. From a Buisness standpoint, Miro i salso a major player in collaboratin sofwatre market. Valued at around $17.5 billion with an annual revenue of $290 million, reflecting its huge adoption across industries.

This powerful solution for remote and hybrid teams has been the best solution for early stages of work such as ideation, workshops, sprint planning, custormer, journey mapping and workflow diagrams. Overall, Miro stands out because it doesn’t just act as a digital whiteboard but as a centralized innvation workspace where teams can visually allign ideas, sturctre designs and collaborate faster befor moving into extecution.

Figma Platform Background

If Miro is where teams think and brainstorm, Figma is where teams design and build. It is a cloud-based UI/UX design and protyping platform that allows teams to design app and website interfaces, create wireframes, build clickable prototypes, and maintain design systems, all while collaborating in real time. Instead of sending endless files, teams can work on the same design simultaneously, comment instantly and ship faster.

Having around 13 million monthly active users with a $749 million revenue in 2024 that continued to rise in 2025, created a big name of Figma in tech world, even attracting a proposed $20 billion Adobe acquisition. Overall Figma stands out because it doesn’t just help you design screens, it helps you build a shared design process where teams can collaborate, iterate, protype, and ship products faster.

Feature	Miro	Figma
Official Website	miro.com	figma.com
Developers	Miro (Andrey Khusid, CEO)	Figma (Dylan Field, CEO)
USPs	Infinite canvas for workshops & mapping	Real-time collaborative vector design
Category	Visual Collaboration / Whiteboarding	UI/UX Design & Prototyping
Integrations	Jira, Slack, Zoom, Asana, Notion	GitHub, Storybook, Zeplin, Slack
Best For	Strategy, Brainstorming, Agile rituals	Web/App Design, Prototyping, Systems
Support Options	Help Center, Email, Community	Help Center, Forum, Priority Support
Documentation	Extensive SDK/API docs	Robust Developer & Plugin docs
Company HQ	San Francisco / Amsterdam	San Francisco, USA
Starting Price	Free (Paid from $8/user/mo)	Free (Paid from $12/user/mo)
Alternatives	Mural, Lucidspark, FigJam	Adobe XD, Sketch, Penpot
Affiliate Program	Yes	Yes
Affiliate Commission	Up to 20% recurring	Varying based on partner tier
Money Back	Case-by-case basis	Generally no (standard SaaS terms)

Miro vs Figma Features

My experience with Miro Features🎨

Miro AI (AI-powered workflow)

Miro AI is the most rescent and modern additions, ehich positions the platform not just as a whiteboard, but as an AI Innovation Workspace. Instead of manually converting raw ideas to structed outcomes, Miro AI helps speed up the entire brainstroming-to-execution workflow. Teams can use AI to generate, edit, and summarize content directly inside boards, useful for complex planning sessions.

Miro also supports AI-powered workflows like Sidekicks and Flows, created to automate repetitive collaboration activities and boost team productivity. This allows users to spend less time manually arranging boards and more time concentrating on decision-making, prioritizing, and carrying out tasks.

Templates & Miroverse

Miro provides an extensive collection of pre-made templates that enable teams to get started quickly without having to create boards from the ground up. Via Miroverse, Miro’s community-driven template platform, users can access thousands of templates designed for activities like brainstorming, sprint planning, mind mapping, customer journey mapping, retrospectives, and product strategy processes. This feature makes Miro particularly valuable for teams seeking organized collaboration with minimal preparation.

Online Whiteboard (Zoomable Canvas)

Imagine Miro as a collaborative digital board where your team can add ideas, link them into workflows, and organize everything visually. Its zoomable canvas helps keep your board tidy and adaptable—ideal for both real-time teamwork and asynchronous collaboration across different teams and time zones.

Talktracks (Interactive Video Walkthroughs)

Talktracks is one of Miro’s standout features, particularly useful for remote and hybrid teams. Rather than writing long messages or scheduling additional meetings, you can simply record a video walkthrough directly on your Miro board, presenting your ideas as you move through the canvas. It’s similar to providing a guided tour of your concepts, enhancing communication by making it clearer, faster, and more interactive.

This feature is particularly helpful when collaborating with cross-functional teams or clients who might not immediately grasp the full context. With Talktracks, viewers can watch your explanation anytime, follow the process step-by-step, and quickly understand the flow of your strategy, workflow, or brainstorming session—without the need for a live call.

Structured Formats

Many people still think Miro is just for brainstorming with sticky notes, but that’s no longer the case. One of its most overlooked features is its support for structured formats like Docs, Tables, Diagrams, and Slides, which makes it much more than a simple whiteboard tool. This allows teams to transition from chaotic ideas to well-organized results without needing to switch between different platforms.

For instance, you can start by brainstorming on the canvas, then convert those ideas into a polished document, organize important points in a table, illustrate processes with diagrams, and even deliver presentations using slides—all within the same workspace. This significantly enhances productivity for teams that want to handle ideation, planning, and presenting all in one place.

My Experience with Figma🎨

Figma AI

Figma has launched Figma AI, a collection of AI-driven features aimed at accelerating workflows and overcoming creative obstacles. These tools assist designers in starting projects more quickly, generating ideas, and automating routine tasks. According to Figma’s official AI information and announcements, the purpose is to enhance creativity and efficiency with features such as search help, workflow enhancements, and AI-supported design, enabling faster product design without compromising quality.

FigJam (Figma’s Online Whiteboard)

The built-in FigJam brainstorming and whiteboard tool for team alignment and early-stage ideation lets teams run workshops, capture ideas with sticky notes, and map concepts with flowcharts, mind maps, and simple diagrams, and is perfect for planning before the UI design starts. And the real strength of FigJam is that it interfaces directly with the Figma ecosystem, so teams can brainstorm in FigJam, organize decisions, and then seamlessly transition into Figma Design for wireframing and interface creation without losing context, which is also where FigJam competes with Miro for teams that would like to do both ideation and design in the same platform.

Figma Design

Figma Design is the heart of Figma’s product, and what teams create are UI screens for websites and apps. Figma runs in the browser, so there are no issues with accessing files, sharing work, and collaborating without the constant version issues you can run into with traditional design software. Figma has powerful tools for creating interfaces, such as frames, grids, typography styling, vector tools, and reusable components, so your work remains organized whether you’re building a basic landing page or a full multi-screen app experience.

Auto Layout

When it comes to creating responsive interfaces, Figma’s Auto Layout is revolutionary. Similar to how layouts function in actual development, it assists UI elements in automatically adjusting spacing, padding, alignment, and resizing when content changes. When creating dynamic screens, such as cards, forms, dashboards, and mobile layouts, this is incredibly helpful. It helps designers think more like developers and minimizes manual adjustments, resulting in designs that are more akin to real-world implementation.

Dev Mode (Design-to-Development Handoff)

Through Dev Mode, Figma facilitates a more seamless developer handoff by converting UI designs into build-ready details. Developers don’t need to “guess” or keep messaging designers in order to view measurements, spacing, colors, and design specs. By structuring the handoff process and lowering mistakes and misunderstandings, Dev Mode maintains alignment between designers and developers. It is particularly useful for product teams that ship frequently and quickly.

Prototyping

You don’t need to write code to transform static designs into clickable flows thanks to Figma’s integrated prototyping tools. This is particularly helpful when presenting concepts to stakeholders or clients, conducting user testing, or showcasing product experiences. To make the prototype feel like a real app, you can add overlays, interactions, transitions, and realistic navigation. Prototyping saves a lot of time and minimizes friction because it takes place on the same platform as design.

Miro vs Figma Pricing

Miro Pricing💸

For individuals, small teams, and large businesses, Miro provides a flexible pricing model. Basic whiteboarding is available for free, while more advanced collaboration, security, and scalability are available with paid plans like Starter, Business, and Enterprise. Here is a brief summary of the primary plans.

Miro’s Free Plan

For individuals or small groups who wish to test out the platform before upgrading, Miro’s Free plan is ideal. You can use templates and have an infinite number of team members, but you can only have three active/editable boards at once. 

Miro Starter Plan

The most practical upgrade for teams seeking unrestricted full collaboration is the Starter plan. Unlimited editable boards, private boards, improved board management, voting, a timer, video calls, and high-quality exports are all made possible by it.

Miro Business Plan

Miro’s business plan is designed for rapidly expanding teams that require more robust security and governance. In addition to everything in Starter, it offers Miro AI credits (50 per month per member), multiple team management, guest collaboration enhancements, and Single Sign-On (SSO).

Miro Enterprise Plan

Enterprise is made for big businesses that require centralized administrative management, advanced security, and privacy controls. Pricing is usually provided as a custom quote, and it offers enterprise-grade features like deeper governance settings, SCIM, domain control, and audit logs.

Figma Pricing💸

Figma uses a plan + seat pricing model, which means that after selecting a plan (Starter, Professional, Organization, or Enterprise), you can choose different seat types based on who needs what access. Collab, Dev, and Full seats are among the various seat types that Figma offers. This is a basic summary of Figma’s primary pricing schemes.

Figma’s Starter Plan

For those who wish to experiment with Figma Design, FigJam, and basic collaboration features, the free Starter plan is perfect. It is ideal for students, novices, and individual projects because it offers unlimited drafts, basic inspection, and limited AI credits.

Figma Professional Plan

Professional is ideal for independent contractors and small groups that require better teamwork and an infinite number of files or projects. The cost of a professional varies depending on the type of seat: 

• Collab seat: $3/month
• Dev seat: $12/month
• Full seat: $16/month

Figma Organization plan

Organization is designed for businesses that require more robust administrative control and shared workflows and design across several teams or departments. It comes with centralized admin tools and improved methods for managing shared libraries among teams.

• Collab seat: $5/month
• Dev seat: $25/month
• Full seat: $55/month

Figma Enterprise Plan

Figma’s top-tier plan, Enterprise, is designed for large organizations that require scalable design system governance and enterprise-grade security. This plan is perfect for businesses that manage several products or brands with complex administrative and security needs. It is billed annually and starts at:

• Collab seat: $5/month
• Dev seat: $35/month
• Full seat: $90/month

Miro vs Figma Alternatives

There are many excellent alternatives available if Miro or Figma don’t completely fit your workflow (or budget). Whether you prioritize UI design and prototyping (like Figma) or brainstorming/whiteboarding (like Miro) will determine which tool is best.

Miro Alternatives

Mural

One of the best substitutes for Miro, MURAL is primarily designed for brainstorming sessions, workshops, and organized teamwork, particularly in business and professional contexts. It is frequently used for remote facilitation and design thinking meetings.

• Visual collaboration boards
• Sticky notes, Mapping framework
• Enterprise-ready collaboration workflow

Microsoft Whiteboard

For teams that already use Microsoft Teams + Office 365, Microsoft Whiteboard is an easy-to-use and lightweight tool. It’s not as sophisticated as Miro for templates and intricate workflows, but it’s excellent for rapid brainstorming.

• Easy Teams intergration
• Best for quick internal collaborations
• Simple sketching and idea sharing

Lucidchart / Lucidspark

Lucid is a powerful Miro substitute for teams that require both structured workflow mapping and ideation because it provides two tools: Lucidchart for diagrams and Lucidspark for brainstorming.

• Flowcharts and mapping
• Strong diagram focused workflow
• Sticky -notes brainstorming

Notion

Although Notion isn’t a whiteboard tool, it’s a good substitute if your team prefers organized planning and documentation over free-form canvases. Teams that want everything in one workspace will find it ideal.

• Inlcudes project planning boards
• Ideal for structured collaborations
• Docs + Tasks + Databases

Figma Alternatives

Adobe XD

For designers who are already familiar with the Adobe ecosystem, Adobe XD is a useful tool for UI/UX design and prototyping. Even though Figma is more popular now, it can still be helpful for prototypes and interface design.

• Adobe workflow familiarity
• Useful for solo designers
• Wireframes with design screens

Sketch

Known for its robust design system workflows, Sketch is a potent UI design tool that is well-liked by macOS users. Although collaboration feels different from Figma’s browser-first model, it’s perfect for teams looking for a polished interface design tool.

• Symbols and design system support
• Mac-friendly workflow
• Great for design teams

Framer

If creating high-quality landing pages with animations and interactive web experiences is your main focus, Framer is perfect. It is frequently utilized by creators and startups who prefer design + publish-like experiences over just design systems.

• Interactive web design feels
• Strong modern UI workflow
• Landing page creation

InVision

In the past, InVision was a well-liked prototyping tool for exchanging designs and getting input. Even though a lot of teams switched to Figma, teams that still use traditional prototype-review workflows can still use InVision.

• Clickable prototypes
• Design review and feedback
• Older but usable workflow

Miro vs Figma Pros and Cons

✅Miro Pros

• Ideal for ideation and brainstorming with mind maps, sticky notes, and processes.
• Features that are useful for workshops, such as a timer, voting, and presenting mode.
• Large template ecosystem to get going fast, including Miroverse.
• Real-time and asynchronous collaboration are supported, making it perfect for remote or hybrid teams.
• Excellent for sprint planning, process diagrams, and journey mapping.
• Talktracks and other helpful additions for async video walkthroughs.

❌Miro Cons

• Limited in comparison to Figma for interface design, it is not a true UI/UX design tool.
• If not properly handled, huge boards may appear disorganized and disorganized.
• Certain sophisticated features are only available with premium programs.

✅Figma Pros

• Outstanding real-time collaboration (design editing akin to Google Docs).
• Robust Dev Mode/Handoff process for developers.
• Incorporates FigJam for internal brainstorming.
• Top-notch design systems (parts, Auto Layout, variations).
• Effective prototyping for user testing and interactive demonstrations.

❌Figma Cons

• Has a more difficult learning curve for people who are not designers.
• Not as effective as Miro for facilitating large-scale workshop-style brainstorming.
• Beginners may find advanced design/system workflows intimidating.
• Seat types determine pricing, which could initially be confusing to small teams.

FAQS

Conclusion

After spending considerable time using both Miro and Figma across real work scenarios -from running sprint retrospectives and strategy workshops to designing mobile app interfaces and building component libraries- my honest take is this: these tools are not rivals so much as they are teammates.

Miro is the tool you reach for when you need to align people, think through problems visually, and collaborate across functions. It’s approachable for non-designers, endlessly flexible, and genuinely powerful for hybrid and remote teams. The Al Workflows and Sidekicks are a welcome addition in 2026, pushing it beyond just a whiteboard into a smart planning environment.

Figma is the tool you reach for when it’s time to turn ideas into actual product design. The prototyping capabilities, component system, and developer handoff features are unmatched. Despite the controversial pricing changes in 2025, it remains the industry standard for UI/UX design and for good reason.

If I had to choose just one: I’d choose Miro for cross-functional teams doing strategic planning, workshops, and agile collaboration. I’d choose Figma for dedicated design and product teams building digital products. And for most scaling companies, using both tools together is not just common it’s the right call.